Candidate evidence in review
Candidate evidence is information YotSignal has identified for possible use, but has not yet promoted into reviewed public authority.
Candidate evidence is not the same as reviewed YotSignal authority.
A lead to check, not a claim to publish.
Candidate evidence is a starting point for review. It is kept in its own lane so it is never mistaken for confirmed public authority.
Candidate evidence has not yet cleared review, so it is kept apart from reviewed authority. A team can see it for what it is without mistaking it for a confirmed public fact.
Internally, candidate evidence can point a reviewer toward the right source, the right model relationship, or the right document, before anything is presented publicly.
Until it is reviewed, candidate evidence should not be treated as verified. It is a lead to check, not a claim to publish.
What candidate evidence looks like.
Examples of information that can be identified as candidate evidence, what review it needs, and how it is treated for public use.
Candidate evidence is not the same as reviewed YotSignal authority. It remains separated until reviewed. Dealers and brokers should read it as context to confirm, not as verified public information.
How candidate evidence can become authority.
Information is flagged as a candidate and kept separate from reviewed authority.
A reviewer checks source clarity, consistency, rights, and public-use posture.
If it clears, it becomes reviewed model intelligence. If not, it stays separated.